MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Dragos Nicolae Madaras [892nd] vs Eric Vanshelboim [511th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head To Head: Madaras 1 - 0 Vanshelboim

They have played 2 sets in total, with Madaras winning 2 and Vanshelboim winning 0. The last match between Madaras and Vanshelboim was at the M25 Varnamo, 13-05-2023, Semifinals, Clay with Dragos Nicolae Madaras getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Dragos Nicolae Madaras 1
Eric Vanshelboim 0
Madaras vs Vanshelboim H2H Profile
Madaras Stats Vanshelboim
0% (0-0) YTD Win/Loss 65% (13-7)
1 Head-to-Head 0
892 Ranking 511
191 Highest Rank 357
27 Age 23
L Plays R
19 Titles 5
66% (324-165) Career Total W/L 64% (239-135)
$42,460 Career Prize Money $0
1 Clay H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Madaras VS Vanshelboim H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-2 6-3

Madaras VS Vanshelboim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Madaras Vs Vanshelboim H2H Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras Madaras Stats Eric Vanshelboim Vanshelboim
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 0
12 Games Won 5
0 Aces (Total) 0
0 Total Double Faults 0
0:0:0 Average Match Time 0:0:0
0% (0/0) 1st Serve % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Serve Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 2nd Serve Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Break Points Won % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Return Points Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Dragos Nicolae Madaras vs Eric Vanshelboim Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Madaras 1 - 0 Vanshelboim

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Madaras has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Vanshelboim has won 43.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Madaras, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vanshelboim has won 46.72%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Madaras has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vanshelboim has saved 53.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Madaras has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Vanshelboim winning 56.72% (W/L 38/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Madaras has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 295/ 139), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Vanshelboim has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 176/ 95), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 6/ 4).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Madaras winning 1 times and Vanshelboim being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Madaras winning 2 and Vanshelboim winning 0. The last match between Madaras and Vanshelboim was at the M25 Varnamo, 13-05-2023, Semifinals, Clay with Dragos Nicolae Madaras getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Madaras and Vanshelboim have played a deciding set 0 times, with Madaras winning 0 times and Vanshelboim 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Madaras winning 0, and Vanshelboim 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Madaras has played against opponents with an average rank of while Vanshelboim has played against players with an average rank of 427.27.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Madaras has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vanshelboim has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Madaras has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vanshelboim has converted 39.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Dragos Nicolae Madaras Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R2
    cross
    Marko Topo
    Player
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras
    60% ( 35 of 58)
    1st Serve %
    72% ( 48 of 67)
    6
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    83% ( 29 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 28 of 48)
    52% ( 12 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 10 of 19)
    21% ( 3 of 14)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    29% ( 17 of 58)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 29 of 67)
    70
    Total Points Won
    55
    L
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras
    Player
    Marco Cecchinato
    72% ( 26 of 36)
    1st Serve %
    78% ( 38 of 49)
    4
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    85% ( 22 of 26)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 19 of 38)
    70% ( 7 of 10)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    19% ( 7 of 36)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 25 of 49)
    54
    Total Points Won
    31
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Kimmer Coppejans
    Player
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras
    50% ( 29 of 58)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 37 of 67)
    2
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    69% ( 20 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 22 of 37)
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 13 of 30)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    40% ( 23 of 58)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 32 of 67)
    67
    Total Points Won
    58
    L
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Jurij Rodionov
    Player
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras
    63% ( 35 of 56)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 42 of 63)
    3
    Aces
    5
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    77% ( 27 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 24 of 42)
    57% ( 12 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 9 of 21)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    30% ( 17 of 56)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 30 of 63)
    69
    Total Points Won
    50
    L
    6-2 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras
    Player
    Remy Bertola
    59% ( 33 of 56)
    1st Serve %
    39% ( 19 of 49)
    3
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    4
    73% ( 24 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    47% ( 9 of 19)
    52% ( 12 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 13 of 30)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    36% ( 20 of 56)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 27 of 49)
    63
    Total Points Won
    42
    W
    6-2 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Luca Van Assche
    Player
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras
    58% ( 36 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 41 of 74)
    3
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    4
    89% ( 32 of 36)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 25 of 41)
    31% ( 8 of 26)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 15 of 33)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    35% ( 22 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 34 of 74)
    74
    Total Points Won
    62
    L
    7-6(2) 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Cristian Garin
    Player
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras
    74% ( 34 of 46)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 33 of 63)
    4
    Aces
    3
    0
    Double Faults
    8
    88% ( 30 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 22 of 33)
    83% ( 10 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 15 of 30)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    13% ( 6 of 46)
    Rtn Points Won
    41% ( 26 of 63)
    66
    Total Points Won
    43
    L
    7-5 6-2 H2H
    F
    cross
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras
    Player
    Vlad Andrei Dancu
    63% ( 37 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    77% ( 36 of 47)
    4
    Aces
    3
    2
    Double Faults
    0
    73% ( 27 of 37)
    1st Serve Won
    53% ( 19 of 36)
    41% ( 9 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    27% ( 3 of 11)
    83% ( 5 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    39% ( 23 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 25 of 47)
    61
    Total Points Won
    45
    W
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras
    Player
    Sebastian Gima
    71% ( 30 of 42)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 26 of 40)
    5
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    80% ( 24 of 30)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 16 of 26)
    75% ( 9 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 4 of 14)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    21% ( 9 of 42)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 20 of 40)
    53
    Total Points Won
    29
    W
    6-3 6-0 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras
    Player
    David Poljak
    62% ( 24 of 39)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 33 of 64)
    4
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    100% ( 24 of 24)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 18 of 33)
    60% ( 9 of 15)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 15 of 31)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    15% ( 6 of 39)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 31 of 64)
    64
    Total Points Won
    39
    W
    6-2 6-3 H2H

    Eric Vanshelboim Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R2
    cross
    Alex Molcan
    Player
    Eric Vanshelboim
    72% ( 64 of 89)
    1st Serve %
    81% ( 65 of 80)
    1
    Aces
    1
    1
    Double Faults
    0
    55% ( 35 of 64)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 36 of 65)
    56% ( 14 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    53% ( 8 of 15)
    36% ( 4 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    45% ( 40 of 89)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 36 of 80)
    85
    Total Points Won
    84
    L
    0-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Eric Vanshelboim
    Player
    Maksim Shin
    78% ( 60 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    72% ( 34 of 47)
    0
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    4
    57% ( 34 of 60)
    1st Serve Won
    47% ( 16 of 34)
    41% ( 7 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    23% ( 3 of 13)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    23% ( 3 of 13)
    47% ( 36 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    60% ( 28 of 47)
    69
    Total Points Won
    55
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Hiroki Moriya
    Player
    Eric Vanshelboim
    52% ( 47 of 90)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 49 of 80)
    2
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    66% ( 31 of 47)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 29 of 49)
    49% ( 21 of 43)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 14 of 31)
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    27% ( 3 of 11)
    42% ( 38 of 90)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 37 of 80)
    89
    Total Points Won
    81
    L
    7-6(5) 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Billy Harris
    Player
    Eric Vanshelboim
    73% ( 35 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    60% ( 25 of 42)
    0
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    80% ( 28 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    72% ( 18 of 25)
    62% ( 8 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 7 of 17)
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    25% ( 12 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 17 of 42)
    53
    Total Points Won
    37
    L
    6-1 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Eric Vanshelboim
    Player
    Jacopo Berrettini
    64% ( 44 of 69)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 35 of 63)
    2
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    66% ( 29 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 23 of 35)
    52% ( 13 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 9 of 28)
    86% ( 6 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    39% ( 27 of 69)
    Rtn Points Won
    49% ( 31 of 63)
    73
    Total Points Won
    59
    W
    7-5 7-5 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Eric Vanshelboim
    Player
    Evgenii Tiurnev
    73% ( 33 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 34 of 54)
    1
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    6
    70% ( 23 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 17 of 34)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    35% ( 7 of 20)
    60% ( 6 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    36% ( 16 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    56% ( 30 of 54)
    59
    Total Points Won
    40
    W
    6-1 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Billy Harris
    Player
    Eric Vanshelboim
    55% ( 35 of 64)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 34 of 54)
    2
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    3
    66% ( 23 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 17 of 34)
    45% ( 13 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    86% ( 6 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    44% ( 28 of 64)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 28 of 54)
    64
    Total Points Won
    54
    L
    7-5 6-2 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Eric Vanshelboim
    Player
    Manish Sureshkumar
    74% ( 37 of 50)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 34 of 48)
    4
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    81% ( 30 of 37)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 17 of 34)
    62% ( 8 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    57% ( 8 of 14)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    24% ( 12 of 50)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 23 of 48)
    61
    Total Points Won
    37
    W
    6-2 6-3 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Eric Vanshelboim
    Player
    Sidharth Rawat
    72% ( 73 of 102)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 64 of 111)
    4
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    56% ( 41 of 73)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 38 of 64)
    59% ( 17 of 29)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 20 of 47)
    37% ( 7 of 19)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    43% ( 44 of 102)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 53 of 111)
    111
    Total Points Won
    102
    W
    6-4 5-7 6-3 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Mert Alkaya
    Player
    Eric Vanshelboim
    74% ( 20 of 27)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 12 of 17)
    1
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    0
    65% ( 13 of 20)
    1st Serve Won
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    43% ( 3 of 7)
    2nd Serve Won
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    41% ( 11 of 27)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 9 of 17)
    25
    Total Points Won
    19
    L
    6-3 6-0 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Madaras & Vanshelboim Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Dragos Nicolae Madaras Madaras Stats Eric Vanshelboim Vanshelboim
    66% (324/165) Win/Loss 64% (239/135)
    64% (700/393) Sets Win/Loss 60% (506/337)
    56% (5453/4264) Games Win/Loss 55% (4149/3461)
    0.19 Aces Per Game 0.1
    882 Aces Total 372
    0.19 Double Faults Per Game 0.21
    894 Total Double Faults 764
    1:19:34 Average Match Time 1:41:55
    502.45 Average Opponent Rank 466.39
    65% (17158/26521) 1st Serve % 73% (16972/23314)
    65% (11119/17158) 1st Serve Win % 62% (10557/16972)
    49% (4589/9361) 2nd Serve Win % 48% (3058/6341)
    49% (1568/3215) Break Points Won % (Total) 48% (1377/2882)
    45% (11671/26157) Return Points Win % 45% (10569/23497)
    68% (315/466) Best of 3 Sets Win % 64% (234/364)
    60% (3/5) Best of 5 Sets Win % 100% (1/1)
    58% (41/71) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 51% (47/93)
    56% (73/131) Deciding Set Win % 69% (71/103)
    88% (324/286) 1st Set Won, Won Match 91% (214/195)
    11% (324/37) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 9% (214/19)
    22% (163/36) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 28% (160/44)

    Other Predictions

    Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona

    flag
    20 Apr
    flag
    17:00
    Prediction

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Gwangju Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...